Ryzen 5 3500X vs Core E5-2620 v3
Description
The 3500X is based on Zen 2 architecture while the E5-2620 v3 is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3500X gets a score of 373.6 k points while the E5-2620 v3 gets 358 k points.
Summarizing, the 3500X is 1 times faster than the E5-2620 v3. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3500X gets a score of 373.6 k points while the E5-2620 v3 gets 358 k points.
Summarizing, the 3500X is 1 times faster than the E5-2620 v3. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
870f10
306f2
Core
Matisse
Haswell-EP
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
3.2 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
6/12
6/12
TDP
65 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
32768 kB
15360 kB
Date
September 2019
September 2014
Mean monothread perf.
66.61k points
35.86k points
Mean multithread perf.
373.61k points
357.99k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3500X
E5-2620 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
15.48k
18.64k (x1.2)
Test#2 (FP)
22.91k
10.55k (x0.46)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.1k
4.12k (x0.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.11k
2.54k (x0.12)
TOTAL
66.61k
35.86k (x0.54)
Multithread
3500X
E5-2620 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
90.39k
181.66k (x2.01)
Test#2 (FP)
139.1k
122.09k (x0.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
53.2k
47.02k (x0.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
90.92k
7.22k (x0.08)
TOTAL
373.61k
357.99k (x0.96)
Performance/W
3500X
E5-2620 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
1391 points/W
2137 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2140 points/W
1436 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
818 points/W
553 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
1399 points/W
85 points/W
TOTAL
5748 points/W
4212 points/W
Performance/GHz
3500X
E5-2620 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
3776 points/GHz
5826 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5588 points/GHz
3297 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1732 points/GHz
1288 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5149 points/GHz
794 points/GHz
TOTAL
16246 points/GHz
11205 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4