Ryzen 5 3500X vs Core i9-10900KF
Description
The 3500X is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i9-10900KF is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3500X gets a score of 373.6 k points while the i9-10900KF gets 825.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10900KF is 2.2 times faster than the 3500X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3500X gets a score of 373.6 k points while the i9-10900KF gets 825.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10900KF is 2.2 times faster than the 3500X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
870f10
a0655
Core
Matisse
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
5.2 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
6/12
10/20
TDP
65 W
125 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
10x32+10x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
10x256 kB
Cache L3
32768 kB
20480 kB
Date
September 2019
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
66.61k points
90.37k points
Mean multithread perf.
373.61k points
825.47k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3500X
i9-10900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
15.48k
35.87k (x2.32)
Test#2 (FP)
22.91k
31.43k (x1.37)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.1k
7.34k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.11k
15.73k (x0.74)
TOTAL
66.61k
90.37k (x1.36)
Multithread
3500X
i9-10900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
90.39k
377.56k (x4.18)
Test#2 (FP)
139.1k
347.59k (x2.5)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
53.2k
88.08k (x1.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
90.92k
12.24k (x0.13)
TOTAL
373.61k
825.47k (x2.21)
Performance/W
3500X
i9-10900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
1391 points/W
3020 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2140 points/W
2781 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
818 points/W
705 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
1399 points/W
98 points/W
TOTAL
5748 points/W
6604 points/W
Performance/GHz
3500X
i9-10900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
3776 points/GHz
6898 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5588 points/GHz
6044 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1732 points/GHz
1411 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5149 points/GHz
3025 points/GHz
TOTAL
16246 points/GHz
17378 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4