| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 3500X vs Core i7-9750H


Description
The 3500X is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i7-9750H is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3500X gets a score of 373.6 k points while the i7-9750H gets 286.4 k points.

Summarizing, the 3500X is 1.3 times faster than the i7-9750H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
870f10
906ea
Core
Matisse
Coffee Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
6/12
6/12
TDP
65 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
32768 kB
12288 kB
Date
September 2019
April 2019
Mean monothread perf.
66.61k points
65.33k points
Mean multithread perf.
373.61k points
286.43k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3500X
i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
15.48k
25.93k (x1.67)
Test#2 (FP)
22.91k
22.84k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.1k
5.11k (x0.72)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.11k
11.46k (x0.54)
TOTAL
66.61k
65.33k (x0.98)

Multithread

3500X

i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
90.39k
130.68k (x1.45)
Test#2 (FP)
139.1k
119.91k (x0.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
53.2k
28.76k (x0.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
90.92k
7.08k (x0.08)
TOTAL
373.61k
286.43k (x0.77)

Performance/W
3500X
i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
1391 points/W
2904 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2140 points/W
2665 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
818 points/W
639 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
1399 points/W
157 points/W
TOTAL
5748 points/W
6365 points/W

Performance/GHz
3500X
i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
3776 points/GHz
5762 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5588 points/GHz
5075 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1732 points/GHz
1135 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5149 points/GHz
2547 points/GHz
TOTAL
16246 points/GHz
14519 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4