Ryzen 5 3500X vs 5625U
Description
The 3500X is based on Zen 2 architecture while the 5625U is based on Zen 3.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3500X gets a score of 373.6 k points while the 5625U gets 281.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 3500X is 1.3 times faster than the 5625U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3500X gets a score of 373.6 k points while the 5625U gets 281.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 3500X is 1.3 times faster than the 5625U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
870f10
a50f00
Core
Matisse
Barcelo
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA1140-FP6
Cores/Threads
6/12
6/12
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
32768 kB
16384 kB
Date
September 2019
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
66.61k points
70.65k points
Mean multithread perf.
373.61k points
281.26k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3500X
5625U
Test#1 (Integers)
15.48k
18.57k (x1.2)
Test#2 (FP)
22.91k
22.03k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.1k
9.55k (x1.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.11k
20.5k (x0.97)
TOTAL
66.61k
70.65k (x1.06)
Multithread
3500X
5625U
Test#1 (Integers)
90.39k
92.92k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
139.1k
128.4k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
53.2k
54.82k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
90.92k
5.13k (x0.06)
TOTAL
373.61k
281.26k (x0.75)
Performance/W
3500X
5625U
Test#1 (Integers)
1391 points/W
6194 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2140 points/W
8560 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
818 points/W
3654 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
1399 points/W
342 points/W
TOTAL
5748 points/W
18750 points/W
Performance/GHz
3500X
5625U
Test#1 (Integers)
3776 points/GHz
4318 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5588 points/GHz
5124 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1732 points/GHz
2221 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5149 points/GHz
4768 points/GHz
TOTAL
16246 points/GHz
16431 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4