Ryzen 5 3500X vs 1600
Description
The 3500X is based on Zen 2 architecture while the 1600 is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3500X gets a score of 373.6 k points while the 1600 gets 272.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 3500X is 1.4 times faster than the 1600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3500X gets a score of 373.6 k points while the 1600 gets 272.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 3500X is 1.4 times faster than the 1600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
870f10
800f11
Core
Matisse
Summit Ridge
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
AM4
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/12
6/12
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
6x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
32768 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
September 2019
April 2017
Mean monothread perf.
66.61k points
56.16k points
Mean multithread perf.
373.61k points
272.8k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3500X
1600
Test#1 (Integers)
15.48k
13.67k (x0.88)
Test#2 (FP)
22.91k
22.28k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.1k
4.99k (x0.7)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.11k
15.22k (x0.72)
TOTAL
66.61k
56.16k (x0.84)
Multithread
3500X
1600
Test#1 (Integers)
90.39k
81.03k (x0.9)
Test#2 (FP)
139.1k
145.84k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
53.2k
39.14k (x0.74)
Test#1 (Memory)
90.92k
6.79k (x0.07)
TOTAL
373.61k
272.8k (x0.73)
Performance/W
3500X
1600
Test#1 (Integers)
1391 points/W
1247 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2140 points/W
2244 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
818 points/W
602 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
1399 points/W
104 points/W
TOTAL
5748 points/W
4197 points/W
Performance/GHz
3500X
1600
Test#1 (Integers)
3776 points/GHz
3797 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5588 points/GHz
6189 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1732 points/GHz
1387 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5149 points/GHz
4228 points/GHz
TOTAL
16246 points/GHz
15601 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4