| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 3500X vs Ryzen 3 2200G


Description
The 3500X is based on Zen 2 architecture while the 2200G is based on Zen.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3500X gets a score of 373.6 k points while the 2200G gets 157.5 k points.

Summarizing, the 3500X is 2.4 times faster than the 2200G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
870f10
810f10
Core
Matisse
Raven Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
AM4
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/4
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
32768 kB
4096 kB
Date
September 2019
February 2018
Mean monothread perf.
66.61k points
44.87k points
Mean multithread perf.
373.61k points
157.54k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3500X
2200G
Test#1 (Integers)
15.48k
13.75k (x0.89)
Test#2 (FP)
22.91k
22.58k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.1k
4.99k (x0.7)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.11k
3.55k (x0.17)
TOTAL
66.61k
44.87k (x0.67)

Multithread

3500X

2200G
Test#1 (Integers)
90.39k
50.99k (x0.56)
Test#2 (FP)
139.1k
84.4k (x0.61)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
53.2k
18.95k (x0.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
90.92k
3.2k (x0.04)
TOTAL
373.61k
157.54k (x0.42)

Performance/W
3500X
2200G
Test#1 (Integers)
1391 points/W
785 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2140 points/W
1298 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
818 points/W
292 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
1399 points/W
49 points/W
TOTAL
5748 points/W
2424 points/W

Performance/GHz
3500X
2200G
Test#1 (Integers)
3776 points/GHz
3716 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5588 points/GHz
6102 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1732 points/GHz
1350 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5149 points/GHz
959 points/GHz
TOTAL
16246 points/GHz
12126 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4