| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 3500U vs Xeon E5506


Description
The 3500U is based on Zen+ architecture while the E5506 is based on Nehalem.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3500U gets a score of 149.2 k points while the E5506 gets 90.4 k points.

Summarizing, the 3500U is 1.7 times faster than the E5506 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
810f81
106a5
Core
Picasso
Gainestown
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
2.133 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
2.133 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
4/8
4 /4
TDP
15 W
80 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+6x32 kB
64 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2019
March 2009
Mean monothread perf.
36.64k points
9.97k points
Mean multithread perf.
140.97k points
90.45k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
3500U
E5506
Test#1 (Integers)
3.24k
1.21k (x0.37)
Test#2 (FP)
13.16k
2.75k (x0.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.41k
1.94k (x0.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.32k
0.78k (x0.24)
TOTAL
24.12k
6.68k (x0.28)

Multithread

3500U

E5506
Test#1 (Integers)
12.95k
12.25k (x0.95)
Test#2 (FP)
57.84k
25.55k (x0.44)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
21.05k
17.1k (x0.81)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.51k
5.01k (x1.43)
TOTAL
95.36k
59.9k (x0.63)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
3500U
E5506
Test#1 (Integers)
11.98k
4.48k (x0.37)
Test#2 (FP)
15.85k
2.99k (x0.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.53k
1.81k (x0.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.29k
0.69k (x0.21)
TOTAL
35.65k
9.97k (x0.28)

Multithread

3500U

E5506
Test#1 (Integers)
48.28k
41k (x0.85)
Test#2 (FP)
74.19k
28.17k (x0.38)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23.29k
17.4k (x0.75)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.47k
3.88k (x1.12)
TOTAL
149.23k
90.45k (x0.61)

Performance/W
3500U
E5506
Test#1 (Integers)
3219 points/W
513 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4946 points/W
352 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1553 points/W
217 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
231 points/W
48 points/W
TOTAL
9949 points/W
1131 points/W

Performance/GHz
3500U
E5506
Test#1 (Integers)
3238 points/GHz
2099 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4283 points/GHz
1404 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1224 points/GHz
847 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
890 points/GHz
325 points/GHz
TOTAL
9634 points/GHz
4675 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4