Ryzen 5 3500U vs Xeon E5-2690 0
Description
The 3500U is based on Zen+ architecture while the E5-2690 0 is based on Sandy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3500U gets a score of 146.6 k points while the E5-2690 0 gets 185.3 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2690 0 is 1.3 times faster than the 3500U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3500U gets a score of 146.6 k points while the E5-2690 0 gets 185.3 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2690 0 is 1.3 times faster than the 3500U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f81
206d7
Core
Picasso
Sandy Bridge-EP
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
LGA 2011
Cores/Threads
4/8
8 /16
TDP
15 W
135 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+6x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
20480 kB
Date
January 2019
March 2012
Mean monothread perf.
36.64k points
23.28k points
Mean multithread perf.
140.97k points
185.26k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
3500U
E5-2690 0
Test#1 (Integers)
11.1k
8.76k (x0.79)
Test#2 (FP)
18.97k
7.35k (x0.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.9k
3.86k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.39k
3.32k (x0.98)
TOTAL
37.37k
23.28k (x0.62)
Multithread
3500U
E5-2690 0
Test#1 (Integers)
45.74k
78.51k (x1.72)
Test#2 (FP)
75.47k
66.46k (x0.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
21.89k
36.42k (x1.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.49k
3.88k (x1.11)
TOTAL
146.6k
185.26k (x1.26)
Performance/W
3500U
E5-2690 0
Test#1 (Integers)
3049 points/W
582 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5032 points/W
492 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1459 points/W
270 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
233 points/W
29 points/W
TOTAL
9773 points/W
1372 points/W
Performance/GHz
3500U
E5-2690 0
Test#1 (Integers)
3001 points/GHz
2305 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5128 points/GHz
1933 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1053 points/GHz
1015 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
916 points/GHz
874 points/GHz
TOTAL
10099 points/GHz
6127 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4