Ryzen 5 3500U vs Xeon E5-2680 v2
Description
The 3500U is based on Zen+ architecture while the E5-2680 v2 is based on Ivy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3500U gets a score of 146.6 k points while the E5-2680 v2 gets 551.1 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2680 v2 is 3.8 times faster than the 3500U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3500U gets a score of 146.6 k points while the E5-2680 v2 gets 551.1 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2680 v2 is 3.8 times faster than the 3500U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f81
306e4
Core
Picasso
Ivy Bridge-EP
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
2.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
LGA 2011
Cores/Threads
4/8
10 /20
TDP
15 W
115 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+6x32 kB
10x32+10x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
10x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
25600 kB
Date
January 2019
September 2013
Mean monothread perf.
36.64k points
28.23k points
Mean multithread perf.
140.97k points
551.1k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
3500U
E5-2680 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
11.98k
11.96k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
15.85k
10.73k (x0.68)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.53k
4.59k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.29k
4.31k (x1.31)
TOTAL
35.65k
31.6k (x0.89)
Multithread
3500U
E5-2680 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
48.28k
218.24k (x4.52)
Test#2 (FP)
74.19k
206.92k (x2.79)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23.29k
100.37k (x4.31)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.47k
11.45k (x3.3)
TOTAL
149.23k
536.99k (x3.6)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
3500U
E5-2680 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
11.1k
10.55k (x0.95)
Test#2 (FP)
18.97k
10.02k (x0.53)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.9k
3.99k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.39k
3.66k (x1.08)
TOTAL
37.37k
28.23k (x0.76)
Multithread
3500U
E5-2680 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
45.74k
215.04k (x4.7)
Test#2 (FP)
75.47k
230.43k (x3.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
21.89k
96.87k (x4.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.49k
8.76k (x2.51)
TOTAL
146.6k
551.1k (x3.76)
Performance/W
3500U
E5-2680 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
3049 points/W
1870 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5032 points/W
2004 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1459 points/W
842 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
233 points/W
76 points/W
TOTAL
9773 points/W
4792 points/W
Performance/GHz
3500U
E5-2680 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
3001 points/GHz
2931 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5128 points/GHz
2784 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1053 points/GHz
1109 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
916 points/GHz
1017 points/GHz
TOTAL
10099 points/GHz
7841 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4