| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 3500U vs Core 2 Quad Q9550


Description
The 3500U is based on Zen+ architecture while the Q9550 is based on Core.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3500U gets a score of 149.2 k points while the Q9550 gets 49 k points.

Summarizing, the 3500U is 3 times faster than the Q9550 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
810f81
1067a
Core
Picasso
Yorkfield
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
2.833 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
2.833 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/4
TDP
15 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+6x32 kB
128+128 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
12288 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
0 kB
Date
January 2019
March 2008
Mean monothread perf.
36.64k points
17.29k points
Mean multithread perf.
140.97k points
48.98k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
3500U
Q9550
Test#1 (Integers)
3.24k
2.6k (x0.8)
Test#2 (FP)
13.16k
6.67k (x0.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.41k
2.72k (x0.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.32k
4.43k (x1.34)
TOTAL
24.12k
16.42k (x0.68)

Multithread

3500U

Q9550
Test#1 (Integers)
12.95k
9.92k (x0.77)
Test#2 (FP)
57.84k
25.37k (x0.44)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
21.05k
10.31k (x0.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.51k
3.37k (x0.96)
TOTAL
95.36k
48.96k (x0.51)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
3500U
Q9550
Test#1 (Integers)
11.98k
3.28k (x0.27)
Test#2 (FP)
15.85k
7.28k (x0.46)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.53k
2.83k (x0.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.29k
3.9k (x1.18)
TOTAL
35.65k
17.29k (x0.48)

Multithread

3500U

Q9550
Test#1 (Integers)
48.28k
11.72k (x0.24)
Test#2 (FP)
74.19k
24.91k (x0.34)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23.29k
9.77k (x0.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.47k
2.57k (x0.74)
TOTAL
149.23k
48.98k (x0.33)

Performance/W
3500U
Q9550
Test#1 (Integers)
3219 points/W
123 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4946 points/W
262 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1553 points/W
103 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
231 points/W
27 points/W
TOTAL
9949 points/W
516 points/W

Performance/GHz
3500U
Q9550
Test#1 (Integers)
3238 points/GHz
1159 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4283 points/GHz
2568 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1224 points/GHz
1001 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
890 points/GHz
1375 points/GHz
TOTAL
9634 points/GHz
6103 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4