| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 3500U vs Core i7-9750H


Description
The 3500U is based on Zen+ architecture while the i7-9750H is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3500U gets a score of 141 k points while the i7-9750H gets 276.5 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-9750H is 2 times faster than the 3500U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
810f81
906ed
Core
Picasso
Coffee Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
15 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+6x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
12288 kB
Date
January 2019
April 2019
Mean monothread perf.
36.64k points
62.92k points
Mean multithread perf.
140.97k points
276.46k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
3500U
i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
3.24k
4.53k (x1.4)
Test#2 (FP)
13.16k
18.24k (x1.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.41k
5.76k (x1.31)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.32k
13.01k (x3.92)
TOTAL
24.12k
41.54k (x1.72)

Multithread

3500U

i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
12.95k
24.3k (x1.88)
Test#2 (FP)
57.84k
97.88k (x1.69)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
21.05k
29.85k (x1.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.51k
11.93k (x3.4)
TOTAL
95.36k
163.95k (x1.72)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
3500U
i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
11.98k
16.32k (x1.36)
Test#2 (FP)
15.85k
23.42k (x1.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.53k
6.04k (x1.33)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.29k
13.24k (x4.02)
TOTAL
35.65k
59.03k (x1.66)

Multithread

3500U

i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
48.28k
86.92k (x1.8)
Test#2 (FP)
74.19k
126.14k (x1.7)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23.29k
29.62k (x1.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.47k
11.86k (x3.42)
TOTAL
149.23k
254.54k (x1.71)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
3500U
i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
11.1k
16.31k (x1.47)
Test#2 (FP)
18.97k
24.48k (x1.29)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.9k
5.87k (x1.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.39k
13.02k (x3.84)
TOTAL
37.37k
59.67k (x1.6)

Multithread

3500U

i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
45.74k
87.54k (x1.91)
Test#2 (FP)
75.47k
131.05k (x1.74)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
21.89k
28.47k (x1.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.49k
11.8k (x3.38)
TOTAL
146.6k
258.87k (x1.77)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3500U
i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
10.88k
25.22k (x2.32)
Test#2 (FP)
18.09k
21.97k (x1.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.29k
5.02k (x1.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.36k
10.71k (x3.19)
TOTAL
36.64k
62.92k (x1.72)

Multithread

3500U

i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
42.44k
125.56k (x2.96)
Test#2 (FP)
73.82k
115.86k (x1.57)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.76k
25.63k (x1.23)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.96k
9.4k (x2.37)
TOTAL
140.97k
276.46k (x1.96)

Performance/W
3500U
i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
2829 points/W
2790 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4921 points/W
2575 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1384 points/W
570 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
264 points/W
209 points/W
TOTAL
9398 points/W
6144 points/W

Performance/GHz
3500U
i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
2942 points/GHz
5605 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4890 points/GHz
4882 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1161 points/GHz
1115 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
909 points/GHz
2380 points/GHz
TOTAL
9901 points/GHz
13982 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4