| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 3500U vs Core i7-6560U


Description
The 3500U is based on Zen+ architecture while the i7-6560U is based on Skylake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3500U gets a score of 141 k points while the i7-6560U gets 107 k points.

Summarizing, the 3500U is 1.3 times faster than the i7-6560U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
810f81
406e3
Core
Picasso
Skylake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.2 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
BGA1356
Cores/Threads
4/8
2/4
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+6x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2019
September 2015
Mean monothread perf.
36.64k points
52.96k points
Mean multithread perf.
140.97k points
107.01k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
3500U
i7-6560U
Test#1 (Integers)
3.24k
3.29k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
13.16k
13.52k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.41k
4.24k (x0.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.32k
7.08k (x2.14)
TOTAL
24.12k
28.14k (x1.17)

Multithread

3500U

i7-6560U
Test#1 (Integers)
12.95k
6.49k (x0.5)
Test#2 (FP)
57.84k
31.11k (x0.54)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
21.05k
10.25k (x0.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.51k
6.16k (x1.76)
TOTAL
95.36k
54.01k (x0.57)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3500U
i7-6560U
Test#1 (Integers)
10.88k
22.21k (x2.04)
Test#2 (FP)
18.09k
19.25k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.29k
4.41k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.36k
7.09k (x2.11)
TOTAL
36.64k
52.96k (x1.45)

Multithread

3500U

i7-6560U
Test#1 (Integers)
42.44k
44.94k (x1.06)
Test#2 (FP)
73.82k
44.98k (x0.61)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.76k
10.83k (x0.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.96k
6.26k (x1.58)
TOTAL
140.97k
107.01k (x0.76)

Performance/W
3500U
i7-6560U
Test#1 (Integers)
2829 points/W
2996 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4921 points/W
2998 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1384 points/W
722 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
264 points/W
418 points/W
TOTAL
9398 points/W
7134 points/W

Performance/GHz
3500U
i7-6560U
Test#1 (Integers)
2942 points/GHz
6941 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4890 points/GHz
6017 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1161 points/GHz
1377 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
909 points/GHz
2214 points/GHz
TOTAL
9901 points/GHz
16550 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4