| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 3500U vs Core i7-4930K


Description
The 3500U is based on Zen+ architecture while the i7-4930K is based on Ivy Bridge.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3500U gets a score of 146.6 k points while the i7-4930K gets 198.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-4930K is 1.4 times faster than the 3500U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
810f81
306e4
Core
Picasso
Ivy Bridge-E
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
LGA 2011
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
15 W
130 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+6x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
12288 kB
Date
January 2019
September 2013
Mean monothread perf.
36.64k points
32.22k points
Mean multithread perf.
140.97k points
198.27k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
3500U
i7-4930K
Test#1 (Integers)
11.1k
12k (x1.08)
Test#2 (FP)
18.97k
11.35k (x0.6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.9k
4.53k (x1.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.39k
4.35k (x1.28)
TOTAL
37.37k
32.22k (x0.86)

Multithread

3500U

i7-4930K
Test#1 (Integers)
45.74k
72.46k (x1.58)
Test#2 (FP)
75.47k
80.33k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
21.89k
33.44k (x1.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.49k
12.03k (x3.44)
TOTAL
146.6k
198.27k (x1.35)

Performance/W
3500U
i7-4930K
Test#1 (Integers)
3049 points/W
557 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5032 points/W
618 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1459 points/W
257 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
233 points/W
93 points/W
TOTAL
9773 points/W
1525 points/W

Performance/GHz
3500U
i7-4930K
Test#1 (Integers)
3001 points/GHz
3077 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5128 points/GHz
2910 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1053 points/GHz
1161 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
916 points/GHz
1115 points/GHz
TOTAL
10099 points/GHz
8262 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4