Ryzen 5 3500U vs Core i7-4820K
Description
The 3500U is based on Zen+ architecture while the i7-4820K is based on Ivy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3500U gets a score of 146.6 k points while the i7-4820K gets 134.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 3500U is 1.1 times faster than the i7-4820K . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3500U gets a score of 146.6 k points while the i7-4820K gets 134.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 3500U is 1.1 times faster than the i7-4820K . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f81
306e4
Core
Picasso
Ivy Bridge -E
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
LGA 1155
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
15 W
130 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+6x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
8192 kB
Date
January 2019
September 2013
Mean monothread perf.
36.64k points
32.49k points
Mean multithread perf.
140.97k points
134.08k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
3500U
i7-4820K
Test#1 (Integers)
11.1k
11.85k (x1.07)
Test#2 (FP)
18.97k
11.84k (x0.62)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.9k
4.69k (x1.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.39k
4.12k (x1.21)
TOTAL
37.37k
32.49k (x0.87)
Multithread
3500U
i7-4820K
Test#1 (Integers)
45.74k
47.65k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
75.47k
54.81k (x0.73)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
21.89k
21.56k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.49k
10.05k (x2.87)
TOTAL
146.6k
134.08k (x0.91)
Performance/W
3500U
i7-4820K
Test#1 (Integers)
3049 points/W
367 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5032 points/W
422 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1459 points/W
166 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
233 points/W
77 points/W
TOTAL
9773 points/W
1031 points/W
Performance/GHz
3500U
i7-4820K
Test#1 (Integers)
3001 points/GHz
3039 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5128 points/GHz
3035 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1053 points/GHz
1201 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
916 points/GHz
1056 points/GHz
TOTAL
10099 points/GHz
8331 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4