Ryzen 5 3500U vs Core i5-8300H
Description
The 3500U is based on Zen+ architecture while the i5-8300H is based on Coffee Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3500U gets a score of 141 k points while the i5-8300H gets 182.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-8300H is 1.3 times faster than the 3500U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3500U gets a score of 141 k points while the i5-8300H gets 182.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-8300H is 1.3 times faster than the 3500U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f81
906ea
Core
Picasso
Coffee Lake-H
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
15 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+6x32 kB
4x32+x4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
8192 kB
Date
January 2019
April 2018
Mean monothread perf.
36.64k points
56.72k points
Mean multithread perf.
140.97k points
182.47k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3500U
i5-8300H
Test#1 (Integers)
10.88k
23.6k (x2.17)
Test#2 (FP)
18.09k
21.72k (x1.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.29k
4.61k (x1.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.36k
6.8k (x2.02)
TOTAL
36.64k
56.72k (x1.55)
Multithread
3500U
i5-8300H
Test#1 (Integers)
42.44k
79.12k (x1.86)
Test#2 (FP)
73.82k
81.27k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.76k
17.46k (x0.84)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.96k
4.62k (x1.17)
TOTAL
140.97k
182.47k (x1.29)
Performance/W
3500U
i5-8300H
Test#1 (Integers)
2829 points/W
1758 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4921 points/W
1806 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1384 points/W
388 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
264 points/W
103 points/W
TOTAL
9398 points/W
4055 points/W
Performance/GHz
3500U
i5-8300H
Test#1 (Integers)
2942 points/GHz
5899 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4890 points/GHz
5431 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1161 points/GHz
1152 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
909 points/GHz
1699 points/GHz
TOTAL
9901 points/GHz
14181 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4