Ryzen 5 3500U vs Core i5-4210U
Description
The 3500U is based on Zen+ architecture while the i5-4210U is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3500U gets a score of 141 k points while the i5-4210U gets 57.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 3500U is 2.4 times faster than the i5-4210U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3500U gets a score of 141 k points while the i5-4210U gets 57.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 3500U is 2.4 times faster than the i5-4210U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f81
40651
Core
Picasso
Haswell
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
1.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
2.7 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
BGA 1169
Cores/Threads
4/8
2/4
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+6x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
3072 kB
Date
January 2019
April 2014
Mean monothread perf.
36.64k points
27.41k points
Mean multithread perf.
140.97k points
57.58k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
3500U
i5-4210U
Test#1 (Integers)
3.24k
2.95k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
13.16k
7.38k (x0.56)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.41k
3.11k (x0.71)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.32k
2.91k (x0.88)
TOTAL
24.12k
16.35k (x0.68)
Multithread
3500U
i5-4210U
Test#1 (Integers)
12.95k
4.86k (x0.38)
Test#2 (FP)
57.84k
17.41k (x0.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
21.05k
7.09k (x0.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.51k
2.5k (x0.71)
TOTAL
95.36k
31.86k (x0.33)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
3500U
i5-4210U
Test#1 (Integers)
11.98k
9.26k (x0.77)
Test#2 (FP)
15.85k
8.2k (x0.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.53k
3.57k (x0.79)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.29k
2.92k (x0.89)
TOTAL
35.65k
23.95k (x0.67)
Multithread
3500U
i5-4210U
Test#1 (Integers)
48.28k
17.53k (x0.36)
Test#2 (FP)
74.19k
17.56k (x0.24)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23.29k
7.65k (x0.33)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.47k
2.49k (x0.72)
TOTAL
149.23k
45.22k (x0.3)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
3500U
i5-4210U
Test#1 (Integers)
11.1k
5.05k (x0.46)
Test#2 (FP)
18.97k
5.31k (x0.28)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.9k
2.1k (x0.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.39k
1.41k (x0.42)
TOTAL
37.37k
13.87k (x0.37)
Multithread
3500U
i5-4210U
Test#1 (Integers)
45.74k
9.01k (x0.2)
Test#2 (FP)
75.47k
16.3k (x0.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
21.89k
4.64k (x0.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.49k
2.16k (x0.62)
TOTAL
146.6k
32.1k (x0.22)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3500U
i5-4210U
Test#1 (Integers)
10.88k
13.79k (x1.27)
Test#2 (FP)
18.09k
7.79k (x0.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.29k
3.11k (x0.72)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.36k
2.72k (x0.81)
TOTAL
36.64k
27.41k (x0.75)
Multithread
3500U
i5-4210U
Test#1 (Integers)
42.44k
28.78k (x0.68)
Test#2 (FP)
73.82k
18.99k (x0.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.76k
7.21k (x0.35)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.96k
2.6k (x0.66)
TOTAL
140.97k
57.58k (x0.41)
Performance/W
3500U
i5-4210U
Test#1 (Integers)
2829 points/W
1919 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4921 points/W
1266 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1384 points/W
481 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
264 points/W
174 points/W
TOTAL
9398 points/W
3839 points/W
Performance/GHz
3500U
i5-4210U
Test#1 (Integers)
2942 points/GHz
5108 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4890 points/GHz
2884 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1161 points/GHz
1150 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
909 points/GHz
1008 points/GHz
TOTAL
9901 points/GHz
10151 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4