| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 3500U vs Core i5-10300H


Description
The 3500U is based on Zen+ architecture while the i5-10300H is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3500U gets a score of 141 k points while the i5-10300H gets 246.1 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10300H is 1.7 times faster than the 3500U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
810f81
a0652
Core
Picasso
Comet Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
15 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+6x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
8192 kB
Date
January 2019
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
36.64k points
69.47k points
Mean multithread perf.
140.97k points
246.07k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
3500U
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
11.1k
15.65k (x1.41)
Test#2 (FP)
18.97k
23.13k (x1.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.9k
5.66k (x1.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.39k
11.43k (x3.37)
TOTAL
37.37k
55.87k (x1.5)

Multithread

3500U

i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
45.74k
26.77k (x0.59)
Test#2 (FP)
75.47k
43.81k (x0.58)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
21.89k
10.17k (x0.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.49k
11.91k (x3.41)
TOTAL
146.6k
92.66k (x0.63)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3500U
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
10.88k
27.14k (x2.49)
Test#2 (FP)
18.09k
24.75k (x1.37)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.29k
5.73k (x1.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.36k
11.84k (x3.52)
TOTAL
36.64k
69.47k (x1.9)

Multithread

3500U

i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
42.44k
105.77k (x2.49)
Test#2 (FP)
73.82k
107.47k (x1.46)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.76k
24.82k (x1.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.96k
8.02k (x2.03)
TOTAL
140.97k
246.07k (x1.75)

Performance/W
3500U
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
2829 points/W
2350 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4921 points/W
2388 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1384 points/W
552 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
264 points/W
178 points/W
TOTAL
9398 points/W
5468 points/W

Performance/GHz
3500U
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
2942 points/GHz
6031 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4890 points/GHz
5500 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1161 points/GHz
1274 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
909 points/GHz
2632 points/GHz
TOTAL
9901 points/GHz
15437 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4