Ryzen 5 3500U vs Core i3-9100T
Description
The 3500U is based on Zen+ architecture while the i3-9100T is based on Coffee Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3500U gets a score of 141 k points while the i3-9100T gets 192.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-9100T is 1.4 times faster than the 3500U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3500U gets a score of 141 k points while the i3-9100T gets 192.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-9100T is 1.4 times faster than the 3500U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f81
906eb
Core
Picasso
Coffee Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/4
TDP
15 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+6x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
January 2019
June 2019
Mean monothread perf.
36.64k points
60.16k points
Mean multithread perf.
140.97k points
192.88k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
3500U
i3-9100T
Test#1 (Integers)
3.24k
3.79k (x1.17)
Test#2 (FP)
13.16k
15.65k (x1.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.41k
4.59k (x1.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.32k
7.78k (x2.35)
TOTAL
24.12k
31.81k (x1.32)
Multithread
3500U
i3-9100T
Test#1 (Integers)
12.95k
13.97k (x1.08)
Test#2 (FP)
57.84k
57.83k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
21.05k
17.03k (x0.81)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.51k
4.35k (x1.24)
TOTAL
95.36k
93.18k (x0.98)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
3500U
i3-9100T
Test#1 (Integers)
11.98k
13.74k (x1.15)
Test#2 (FP)
15.85k
19.7k (x1.24)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.53k
4.86k (x1.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.29k
8.61k (x2.62)
TOTAL
35.65k
46.91k (x1.32)
Multithread
3500U
i3-9100T
Test#1 (Integers)
48.28k
50.5k (x1.05)
Test#2 (FP)
74.19k
72.58k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23.29k
18.09k (x0.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.47k
4.28k (x1.23)
TOTAL
149.23k
145.45k (x0.97)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
3500U
i3-9100T
Test#1 (Integers)
11.1k
13.6k (x1.22)
Test#2 (FP)
18.97k
20.58k (x1.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.9k
4.76k (x1.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.39k
8.8k (x2.59)
TOTAL
37.37k
47.74k (x1.28)
Multithread
3500U
i3-9100T
Test#1 (Integers)
45.74k
50.18k (x1.1)
Test#2 (FP)
75.47k
75.99k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
21.89k
17.66k (x0.81)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.49k
4.12k (x1.18)
TOTAL
146.6k
147.95k (x1.01)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3500U
i3-9100T
Test#1 (Integers)
10.88k
24.89k (x2.29)
Test#2 (FP)
18.09k
21.82k (x1.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.29k
4.83k (x1.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.36k
8.63k (x2.57)
TOTAL
36.64k
60.16k (x1.64)
Multithread
3500U
i3-9100T
Test#1 (Integers)
42.44k
89.4k (x2.11)
Test#2 (FP)
73.82k
81.19k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.76k
18.06k (x0.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.96k
4.24k (x1.07)
TOTAL
140.97k
192.88k (x1.37)
Performance/W
3500U
i3-9100T
Test#1 (Integers)
2829 points/W
2554 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4921 points/W
2320 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1384 points/W
516 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
264 points/W
121 points/W
TOTAL
9398 points/W
5511 points/W
Performance/GHz
3500U
i3-9100T
Test#1 (Integers)
2942 points/GHz
6727 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4890 points/GHz
5897 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1161 points/GHz
1304 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
909 points/GHz
2331 points/GHz
TOTAL
9901 points/GHz
16260 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4