Ryzen 5 3500U vs Core i3-3220
Description
The 3500U is based on Zen+ architecture while the i3-3220 is based on Ivy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3500U gets a score of 146.6 k points while the i3-3220 gets 55.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 3500U is 2.6 times faster than the i3-3220 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3500U gets a score of 146.6 k points while the i3-3220 gets 55.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 3500U is 2.6 times faster than the i3-3220 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f81
306a9
Core
Picasso
Ivy Bridge
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.3 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
LGA 1155
Cores/Threads
4/8
2/4
TDP
15 W
55 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+6x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
3072 kB
Date
January 2019
September 2012
Mean monothread perf.
36.64k points
25.06k points
Mean multithread perf.
140.97k points
55.82k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
3500U
i3-3220
Test#1 (Integers)
11.1k
8.29k (x0.75)
Test#2 (FP)
18.97k
9.1k (x0.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.9k
3.93k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.39k
3.74k (x1.1)
TOTAL
37.37k
25.06k (x0.67)
Multithread
3500U
i3-3220
Test#1 (Integers)
45.74k
19.26k (x0.42)
Test#2 (FP)
75.47k
24.65k (x0.33)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
21.89k
8.75k (x0.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.49k
3.15k (x0.9)
TOTAL
146.6k
55.82k (x0.38)
Performance/W
3500U
i3-3220
Test#1 (Integers)
3049 points/W
350 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5032 points/W
448 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1459 points/W
159 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
233 points/W
57 points/W
TOTAL
9773 points/W
1015 points/W
Performance/GHz
3500U
i3-3220
Test#1 (Integers)
3001 points/GHz
2513 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5128 points/GHz
2756 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1053 points/GHz
1190 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
916 points/GHz
1134 points/GHz
TOTAL
10099 points/GHz
7593 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4