| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 3500U vs Core i3-10100


Description
The 3500U is based on Zen+ architecture while the i3-10100 is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3500U gets a score of 141 k points while the i3-10100 gets 162.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-10100 is 1.2 times faster than the 3500U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
810f81
a0653
Core
Picasso
Comet Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+6x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
January 2019
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
36.64k points
55.41k points
Mean multithread perf.
140.97k points
162.33k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3500U
i3-10100
Test#1 (Integers)
10.88k
22.74k (x2.09)
Test#2 (FP)
18.09k
20.31k (x1.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.29k
4.71k (x1.1)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.36k
7.65k (x2.28)
TOTAL
36.64k
55.41k (x1.51)

Multithread

3500U

i3-10100
Test#1 (Integers)
42.44k
71.95k (x1.7)
Test#2 (FP)
73.82k
67.7k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.76k
16.43k (x0.79)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.96k
6.25k (x1.58)
TOTAL
140.97k
162.33k (x1.15)

Performance/W
3500U
i3-10100
Test#1 (Integers)
2829 points/W
1107 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4921 points/W
1042 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1384 points/W
253 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
264 points/W
96 points/W
TOTAL
9398 points/W
2497 points/W

Performance/GHz
3500U
i3-10100
Test#1 (Integers)
2942 points/GHz
5288 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4890 points/GHz
4724 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1161 points/GHz
1095 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
909 points/GHz
1779 points/GHz
TOTAL
9901 points/GHz
12886 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4