Ryzen 5 3500U vs Core M-5Y10c
Description
The 3500U is based on Zen+ architecture while the M-5Y10c is based on Broadwell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3500U gets a score of 146.6 k points while the M-5Y10c gets 51 k points.
Summarizing, the 3500U is 2.9 times faster than the M-5Y10c . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3500U gets a score of 146.6 k points while the M-5Y10c gets 51 k points.
Summarizing, the 3500U is 2.9 times faster than the M-5Y10c . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f81
306d4
Core
Picasso
Broadwell-Y
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
0.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
2 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
4/8
2/4
TDP
15 W
5 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+6x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2019
October 2014
Mean monothread perf.
36.64k points
22.93k points
Mean multithread perf.
140.97k points
51k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
3500U
M-5Y10c
Test#1 (Integers)
11.1k
7.22k (x0.65)
Test#2 (FP)
18.97k
9.98k (x0.53)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.9k
2.75k (x0.71)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.39k
2.98k (x0.88)
TOTAL
37.37k
22.93k (x0.61)
Multithread
3500U
M-5Y10c
Test#1 (Integers)
45.74k
15.07k (x0.33)
Test#2 (FP)
75.47k
24.8k (x0.33)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
21.89k
6.68k (x0.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.49k
4.46k (x1.27)
TOTAL
146.6k
51k (x0.35)
Performance/W
3500U
M-5Y10c
Test#1 (Integers)
3049 points/W
3014 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5032 points/W
4960 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1459 points/W
1335 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
233 points/W
891 points/W
TOTAL
9773 points/W
10200 points/W
Performance/GHz
3500U
M-5Y10c
Test#1 (Integers)
3001 points/GHz
3611 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5128 points/GHz
4990 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1053 points/GHz
1374 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
916 points/GHz
1492 points/GHz
TOTAL
10099 points/GHz
11467 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4