Ryzen 5 3500U vs Ryzen 7 1700
Description
The 3500U is based on Zen+ architecture while the 1700 is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3500U gets a score of 141 k points while the 1700 gets 333.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 1700 is 2.4 times faster than the 3500U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3500U gets a score of 141 k points while the 1700 gets 333.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 1700 is 2.4 times faster than the 3500U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f81
800f11
Core
Picasso
Summit Ridge
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+6x32 kB
8x64+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
January 2019
March 2017
Mean monothread perf.
36.64k points
52.69k points
Mean multithread perf.
140.97k points
333.31k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
3500U
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
11.1k
13.95k (x1.26)
Test#2 (FP)
18.97k
22.02k (x1.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.9k
5.17k (x1.33)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.39k
16.61k (x4.9)
TOTAL
37.37k
57.75k (x1.55)
Multithread
3500U
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
45.74k
120.59k (x2.64)
Test#2 (FP)
75.47k
197.34k (x2.61)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
21.89k
56.83k (x2.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.49k
6.41k (x1.83)
TOTAL
146.6k
381.16k (x2.6)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3500U
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
10.88k
12.65k (x1.16)
Test#2 (FP)
18.09k
20.95k (x1.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.29k
4.63k (x1.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.36k
14.47k (x4.3)
TOTAL
36.64k
52.69k (x1.44)
Multithread
3500U
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
42.44k
101.78k (x2.4)
Test#2 (FP)
73.82k
177.57k (x2.41)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.76k
47.18k (x2.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.96k
6.78k (x1.71)
TOTAL
140.97k
333.31k (x2.36)
Performance/W
3500U
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
2829 points/W
1566 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4921 points/W
2732 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1384 points/W
726 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
264 points/W
104 points/W
TOTAL
9398 points/W
5128 points/W
Performance/GHz
3500U
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
2942 points/GHz
3419 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4890 points/GHz
5661 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1161 points/GHz
1251 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
909 points/GHz
3911 points/GHz
TOTAL
9901 points/GHz
14241 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4