Ryzen 5 3400G vs Xeon Silver 4110
Description
The 3400G is based on Zen+ architecture while the 4110 is based on Skylake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3400G gets a score of 200.3 k points while the 4110 gets 281.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 4110 is 1.4 times faster than the 3400G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3400G gets a score of 200.3 k points while the 4110 gets 281.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 4110 is 1.4 times faster than the 3400G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f81
50654
Core
Picasso
Skylake-SP
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA3647
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
65 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
11264 kB
Date
July 2019
July 2017
Mean monothread perf.
50.25k points
45.82k points
Mean multithread perf.
200.34k points
281.48k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3400G
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
14.58k
18.78k (x1.29)
Test#2 (FP)
23.98k
16.25k (x0.68)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.35k
3.99k (x0.75)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.34k
6.8k (x1.07)
TOTAL
50.25k
45.82k (x0.91)
Multithread
3400G
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
57.37k
133.55k (x2.33)
Test#2 (FP)
107.03k
108.43k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.9k
30.02k (x1.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.05k
9.48k (x1.35)
TOTAL
200.34k
281.48k (x1.4)
Performance/W
3400G
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
883 points/W
1571 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1647 points/W
1276 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
445 points/W
353 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
108 points/W
112 points/W
TOTAL
3082 points/W
3311 points/W
Performance/GHz
3400G
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
3471 points/GHz
6259 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5710 points/GHz
5417 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1275 points/GHz
1330 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1509 points/GHz
2267 points/GHz
TOTAL
11965 points/GHz
15273 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4