Ryzen 5 3400G vs Xeon E3-1220 v3
Description
The 3400G is based on Zen+ architecture while the E3-1220 v3 is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3400G gets a score of 200.3 k points while the E3-1220 v3 gets 140.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 3400G is 1.4 times faster than the E3-1220 v3 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3400G gets a score of 200.3 k points while the E3-1220 v3 gets 140.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 3400G is 1.4 times faster than the E3-1220 v3 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f81
306c3
Core
Picasso
Haswell-WS
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1150
Cores/Threads
4/8
4 /4
TDP
65 W
80 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
64 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
8192 kB
Date
July 2019
June 2013
Mean monothread perf.
50.25k points
39.16k points
Mean multithread perf.
200.34k points
140.76k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3400G
E3-1220 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
14.58k
19.17k (x1.31)
Test#2 (FP)
23.98k
10.55k (x0.44)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.35k
4.79k (x0.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.34k
4.65k (x0.73)
TOTAL
50.25k
39.16k (x0.78)
Multithread
3400G
E3-1220 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
57.37k
73.13k (x1.27)
Test#2 (FP)
107.03k
42.06k (x0.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.9k
18.03k (x0.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.05k
7.54k (x1.07)
TOTAL
200.34k
140.76k (x0.7)
Performance/W
3400G
E3-1220 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
883 points/W
914 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1647 points/W
526 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
445 points/W
225 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
108 points/W
94 points/W
TOTAL
3082 points/W
1759 points/W
Performance/GHz
3400G
E3-1220 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
3471 points/GHz
5478 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5710 points/GHz
3014 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1275 points/GHz
1368 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1509 points/GHz
1328 points/GHz
TOTAL
11965 points/GHz
11188 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4