| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 3400G vs Core i7-6560U


Description
The 3400G is based on Zen+ architecture while the i7-6560U is based on Skylake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3400G gets a score of 200.3 k points while the i7-6560U gets 107 k points.

Summarizing, the 3400G is 1.9 times faster than the i7-6560U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
810f81
406e3
Core
Picasso
Skylake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
3.2 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA1356
Cores/Threads
4/8
2/4
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
4096 kB
Date
July 2019
September 2015
Mean monothread perf.
50.25k points
52.96k points
Mean multithread perf.
200.34k points
107.01k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3400G
i7-6560U
Test#1 (Integers)
14.58k
22.21k (x1.52)
Test#2 (FP)
23.98k
19.25k (x0.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.35k
4.41k (x0.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.34k
7.09k (x1.12)
TOTAL
50.25k
52.96k (x1.05)

Multithread

3400G

i7-6560U
Test#1 (Integers)
57.37k
44.94k (x0.78)
Test#2 (FP)
107.03k
44.98k (x0.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.9k
10.83k (x0.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.05k
6.26k (x0.89)
TOTAL
200.34k
107.01k (x0.53)

Performance/W
3400G
i7-6560U
Test#1 (Integers)
883 points/W
2996 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1647 points/W
2998 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
445 points/W
722 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
108 points/W
418 points/W
TOTAL
3082 points/W
7134 points/W

Performance/GHz
3400G
i7-6560U
Test#1 (Integers)
3471 points/GHz
6941 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5710 points/GHz
6017 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1275 points/GHz
1377 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1509 points/GHz
2214 points/GHz
TOTAL
11965 points/GHz
16550 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4