| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 3400G vs Core i7-10750H


Description
The 3400G is based on Zen+ architecture while the i7-10750H is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3400G gets a score of 200.3 k points while the i7-10750H gets 349.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-10750H is 1.7 times faster than the 3400G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
810f81
a0652
Core
Picasso
Comet Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
65 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
12288 kB
Date
July 2019
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
50.25k points
75.67k points
Mean multithread perf.
200.34k points
349.21k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3400G
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
14.58k
29.06k (x1.99)
Test#2 (FP)
23.98k
26.49k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.35k
6.23k (x1.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.34k
13.89k (x2.19)
TOTAL
50.25k
75.67k (x1.51)

Multithread

3400G

i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
57.37k
154.61k (x2.7)
Test#2 (FP)
107.03k
151.34k (x1.41)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.9k
36.33k (x1.26)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.05k
6.93k (x0.98)
TOTAL
200.34k
349.21k (x1.74)

Performance/W
3400G
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
883 points/W
3436 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1647 points/W
3363 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
445 points/W
807 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
108 points/W
154 points/W
TOTAL
3082 points/W
7760 points/W

Performance/GHz
3400G
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
3471 points/GHz
5811 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5710 points/GHz
5298 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1275 points/GHz
1246 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1509 points/GHz
2778 points/GHz
TOTAL
11965 points/GHz
15133 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4