Ryzen 5 3400G vs Core i5-8265U
Description
The 3400G is based on Zen+ architecture while the i5-8265U is based on Whiskey Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3400G gets a score of 200.3 k points while the i5-8265U gets 143.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 3400G is 1.4 times faster than the i5-8265U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3400G gets a score of 200.3 k points while the i5-8265U gets 143.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 3400G is 1.4 times faster than the i5-8265U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f81
806ec
Core
Picasso
Whiskey Lake-U
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA1528
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
July 2019
August 2018
Mean monothread perf.
50.25k points
46.67k points
Mean multithread perf.
200.34k points
143.23k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3400G
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
14.58k
19.19k (x1.32)
Test#2 (FP)
23.98k
17.47k (x0.73)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.35k
4.04k (x0.76)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.34k
5.97k (x0.94)
TOTAL
50.25k
46.67k (x0.93)
Multithread
3400G
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
57.37k
64.43k (x1.12)
Test#2 (FP)
107.03k
61.91k (x0.58)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.9k
13.36k (x0.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.05k
3.52k (x0.5)
TOTAL
200.34k
143.23k (x0.71)
Performance/W
3400G
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
883 points/W
4296 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1647 points/W
4128 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
445 points/W
890 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
108 points/W
235 points/W
TOTAL
3082 points/W
9548 points/W
Performance/GHz
3400G
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
3471 points/GHz
4920 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5710 points/GHz
4478 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1275 points/GHz
1037 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1509 points/GHz
1531 points/GHz
TOTAL
11965 points/GHz
11966 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4