Ryzen 5 3400G vs Core i3-6100U
Description
The 3400G is based on Zen+ architecture while the i3-6100U is based on Skylake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3400G gets a score of 200.3 k points while the i3-6100U gets 69.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 3400G is 2.9 times faster than the i3-6100U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3400G gets a score of 200.3 k points while the i3-6100U gets 69.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 3400G is 2.9 times faster than the i3-6100U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f81
406e3
Core
Picasso
Skylake-U
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
2.3 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA1356
Cores/Threads
4/8
2/4
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
3072 kB
Date
July 2019
September 2015
Mean monothread perf.
50.25k points
30.73k points
Mean multithread perf.
200.34k points
69.94k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3400G
i3-6100U
Test#1 (Integers)
14.58k
12.55k (x0.86)
Test#2 (FP)
23.98k
12.19k (x0.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.35k
2.81k (x0.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.34k
3.18k (x0.5)
TOTAL
50.25k
30.73k (x0.61)
Multithread
3400G
i3-6100U
Test#1 (Integers)
57.37k
29.33k (x0.51)
Test#2 (FP)
107.03k
28.81k (x0.27)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.9k
6.46k (x0.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.05k
5.33k (x0.76)
TOTAL
200.34k
69.94k (x0.35)
Performance/W
3400G
i3-6100U
Test#1 (Integers)
883 points/W
1956 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1647 points/W
1921 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
445 points/W
431 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
108 points/W
356 points/W
TOTAL
3082 points/W
4663 points/W
Performance/GHz
3400G
i3-6100U
Test#1 (Integers)
3471 points/GHz
5459 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5710 points/GHz
5302 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1275 points/GHz
1220 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1509 points/GHz
1382 points/GHz
TOTAL
11965 points/GHz
13362 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4