Ryzen 5 3400G vs Core i3-6100
Description
The 3400G is based on Zen+ architecture while the i3-6100 is based on Skylake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3400G gets a score of 200.3 k points while the i3-6100 gets 112.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 3400G is 1.8 times faster than the i3-6100 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3400G gets a score of 200.3 k points while the i3-6100 gets 112.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 3400G is 1.8 times faster than the i3-6100 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f81
506e3
Core
Picasso
Skylake-S
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
4/8
2/2
TDP
65 W
51 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
4096 kB
Date
July 2019
September 2015
Mean monothread perf.
50.25k points
52.84k points
Mean multithread perf.
200.34k points
112.28k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3400G
i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
14.58k
22.89k (x1.57)
Test#2 (FP)
23.98k
21.04k (x0.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.35k
4.9k (x0.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.34k
4.01k (x0.63)
TOTAL
50.25k
52.84k (x1.05)
Multithread
3400G
i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
57.37k
50.05k (x0.87)
Test#2 (FP)
107.03k
47.13k (x0.44)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.9k
11.38k (x0.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.05k
3.72k (x0.53)
TOTAL
200.34k
112.28k (x0.56)
Performance/W
3400G
i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
883 points/W
981 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1647 points/W
924 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
445 points/W
223 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
108 points/W
73 points/W
TOTAL
3082 points/W
2202 points/W
Performance/GHz
3400G
i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
3471 points/GHz
6187 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5710 points/GHz
5686 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1275 points/GHz
1325 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1509 points/GHz
1084 points/GHz
TOTAL
11965 points/GHz
14282 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4