| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 3400G vs Ryzen 7 4800H


Description
The 3400G is based on Zen+ architecture while the 4800H is based on Zen 2.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3400G gets a score of 200.3 k points while the 4800H gets 436.8 k points.

Summarizing, the 4800H is 2.2 times faster than the 3400G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
810f81
860f01
Core
Picasso
Renoir
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA-FP6
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
65 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
2x4096 kB
Date
July 2019
January 2020
Mean monothread perf.
50.25k points
57.47k points
Mean multithread perf.
200.34k points
436.8k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3400G
4800H
Test#1 (Integers)
14.58k
16.59k (x1.14)
Test#2 (FP)
23.98k
23.51k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.35k
9.38k (x1.75)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.34k
7.98k (x1.26)
TOTAL
50.25k
57.47k (x1.14)

Multithread

3400G

4800H
Test#1 (Integers)
57.37k
152.43k (x2.66)
Test#2 (FP)
107.03k
195.79k (x1.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.9k
83.2k (x2.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.05k
5.38k (x0.76)
TOTAL
200.34k
436.8k (x2.18)

Performance/W
3400G
4800H
Test#1 (Integers)
883 points/W
3387 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1647 points/W
4351 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
445 points/W
1849 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
108 points/W
120 points/W
TOTAL
3082 points/W
9707 points/W

Performance/GHz
3400G
4800H
Test#1 (Integers)
3471 points/GHz
3950 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5710 points/GHz
5599 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1275 points/GHz
2234 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1509 points/GHz
1899 points/GHz
TOTAL
11965 points/GHz
13683 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4