| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 3400G vs Ryzen 7 1800X


Description
The 3400G is based on Zen+ architecture while the 1800X is based on Zen.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3400G gets a score of 200.3 k points while the 1800X gets 410.5 k points.

Summarizing, the 1800X is 2 times faster than the 3400G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
810f81
800f11
Core
Picasso
Summit Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
AM4
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
65 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
8x64+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
July 2019
March 2017
Mean monothread perf.
50.25k points
61.07k points
Mean multithread perf.
200.34k points
410.47k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3400G
1800X
Test#1 (Integers)
14.58k
15.02k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
23.98k
24.26k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.35k
5.53k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.34k
16.26k (x2.57)
TOTAL
50.25k
61.07k (x1.22)

Multithread

3400G

1800X
Test#1 (Integers)
57.37k
122.92k (x2.14)
Test#2 (FP)
107.03k
220.32k (x2.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.9k
59.78k (x2.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.05k
7.44k (x1.06)
TOTAL
200.34k
410.47k (x2.05)

Performance/W
3400G
1800X
Test#1 (Integers)
883 points/W
1294 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1647 points/W
2319 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
445 points/W
629 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
108 points/W
78 points/W
TOTAL
3082 points/W
4321 points/W

Performance/GHz
3400G
1800X
Test#1 (Integers)
3471 points/GHz
3756 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5710 points/GHz
6065 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1275 points/GHz
1382 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1509 points/GHz
4065 points/GHz
TOTAL
11965 points/GHz
15267 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4