| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 3400G vs 3600


Description
The 3400G is based on Zen+ architecture while the 3600 is based on Zen 2.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3400G gets a score of 200.3 k points while the 3600 gets 348.4 k points.

Summarizing, the 3600 is 1.7 times faster than the 3400G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
810f81
870f10
Core
Picasso
Matisse
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
AM4
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
32768 kB
Date
July 2019
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
50.25k points
70.55k points
Mean multithread perf.
200.34k points
348.35k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3400G
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
14.58k
16.04k (x1.1)
Test#2 (FP)
23.98k
24.47k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.35k
8.38k (x1.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.34k
21.66k (x3.42)
TOTAL
50.25k
70.55k (x1.4)

Multithread

3400G

3600
Test#1 (Integers)
57.37k
113.63k (x1.98)
Test#2 (FP)
107.03k
143.55k (x1.34)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.9k
63.84k (x2.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.05k
27.34k (x3.88)
TOTAL
200.34k
348.35k (x1.74)

Performance/W
3400G
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
883 points/W
1748 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1647 points/W
2208 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
445 points/W
982 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
108 points/W
421 points/W
TOTAL
3082 points/W
5359 points/W

Performance/GHz
3400G
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
3471 points/GHz
3819 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5710 points/GHz
5825 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1275 points/GHz
1995 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1509 points/GHz
5158 points/GHz
TOTAL
11965 points/GHz
16797 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4