| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 3400G vs Ryzen 3 2200G


Description
The 3400G is based on Zen+ architecture while the 2200G is based on Zen.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3400G gets a score of 200.3 k points while the 2200G gets 157.5 k points.

Summarizing, the 3400G is 1.3 times faster than the 2200G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
810f81
810f10
Core
Picasso
Raven Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
AM4
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/4
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
4096 kB
Date
July 2019
February 2018
Mean monothread perf.
50.25k points
44.87k points
Mean multithread perf.
200.34k points
157.54k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3400G
2200G
Test#1 (Integers)
14.58k
13.75k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
23.98k
22.58k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.35k
4.99k (x0.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.34k
3.55k (x0.56)
TOTAL
50.25k
44.87k (x0.89)

Multithread

3400G

2200G
Test#1 (Integers)
57.37k
50.99k (x0.89)
Test#2 (FP)
107.03k
84.4k (x0.79)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.9k
18.95k (x0.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.05k
3.2k (x0.45)
TOTAL
200.34k
157.54k (x0.79)

Performance/W
3400G
2200G
Test#1 (Integers)
883 points/W
785 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1647 points/W
1298 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
445 points/W
292 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
108 points/W
49 points/W
TOTAL
3082 points/W
2424 points/W

Performance/GHz
3400G
2200G
Test#1 (Integers)
3471 points/GHz
3716 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5710 points/GHz
6102 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1275 points/GHz
1350 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1509 points/GHz
959 points/GHz
TOTAL
11965 points/GHz
12126 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4