Ryzen 5 2600X vs Xeon Silver 4110
Description
The 2600X is based on Zen+ architecture while the 4110 is based on Skylake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2600X gets a score of 333.1 k points while the 4110 gets 281.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 2600X is 1.2 times faster than the 4110. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2600X gets a score of 333.1 k points while the 4110 gets 281.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 2600X is 1.2 times faster than the 4110. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
800f82
50654
Core
Pinnacle Ridge
Skylake-SP
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA3647
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
95 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x64+6x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
11264 kB
Date
April 2018
July 2017
Mean monothread perf.
66.44k points
45.82k points
Mean multithread perf.
333.12k points
281.48k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2600X
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
15.75k
18.78k (x1.19)
Test#2 (FP)
26.29k
16.25k (x0.62)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.91k
3.99k (x0.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
18.48k
6.8k (x0.37)
TOTAL
66.44k
45.82k (x0.69)
Multithread
2600X
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
94.49k
133.55k (x1.41)
Test#2 (FP)
182.53k
108.43k (x0.59)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
45.95k
30.02k (x0.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.15k
9.48k (x0.93)
TOTAL
333.12k
281.48k (x0.84)
Performance/W
2600X
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
995 points/W
1571 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1921 points/W
1276 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
484 points/W
353 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
107 points/W
112 points/W
TOTAL
3507 points/W
3311 points/W
Performance/GHz
2600X
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
3749 points/GHz
6259 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6261 points/GHz
5417 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1408 points/GHz
1330 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4401 points/GHz
2267 points/GHz
TOTAL
15819 points/GHz
15273 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4