Ryzen 5 2600X vs Core i9-10940X
Description
The 2600X is based on Zen+ architecture while the i9-10940X is based on Cascade Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2600X gets a score of 333.1 k points while the i9-10940X gets 1088.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10940X is 3.3 times faster than the 2600X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2600X gets a score of 333.1 k points while the i9-10940X gets 1088.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10940X is 3.3 times faster than the 2600X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
800f82
50657
Core
Pinnacle Ridge
Cascade Lake-X
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
4.8 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 2066
Cores/Threads
6/12
14/28
TDP
95 W
165 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x64+6x32 kB
14x32+14x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
14x1024 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
19712 kB
Date
April 2018
November 2019
Mean monothread perf.
66.44k points
72.04k points
Mean multithread perf.
333.12k points
1088.11k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2600X
i9-10940X
Test#1 (Integers)
15.75k
29.75k (x1.89)
Test#2 (FP)
26.29k
27.44k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.91k
5.81k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
18.48k
9.05k (x0.49)
TOTAL
66.44k
72.04k (x1.08)
Multithread
2600X
i9-10940X
Test#1 (Integers)
94.49k
485.37k (x5.14)
Test#2 (FP)
182.53k
472.7k (x2.59)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
45.95k
113.09k (x2.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.15k
16.95k (x1.67)
TOTAL
333.12k
1088.11k (x3.27)
Performance/W
2600X
i9-10940X
Test#1 (Integers)
995 points/W
2942 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1921 points/W
2865 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
484 points/W
685 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
107 points/W
103 points/W
TOTAL
3507 points/W
6595 points/W
Performance/GHz
2600X
i9-10940X
Test#1 (Integers)
3749 points/GHz
6197 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6261 points/GHz
5717 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1408 points/GHz
1210 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4401 points/GHz
1885 points/GHz
TOTAL
15819 points/GHz
15009 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4