| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 2600X vs Core i7-9750H


Description
The 2600X is based on Zen+ architecture while the i7-9750H is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2600X gets a score of 333.1 k points while the i7-9750H gets 276.5 k points.

Summarizing, the 2600X is 1.2 times faster than the i7-9750H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
800f82
906ed
Core
Pinnacle Ridge
Coffee Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
6/12
6/12
TDP
95 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x64+6x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
12288 kB
Date
April 2018
April 2019
Mean monothread perf.
66.44k points
62.92k points
Mean multithread perf.
333.12k points
276.46k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2600X
i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
15.75k
25.22k (x1.6)
Test#2 (FP)
26.29k
21.97k (x0.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.91k
5.02k (x0.85)
Test#1 (Memory)
18.48k
10.71k (x0.58)
TOTAL
66.44k
62.92k (x0.95)

Multithread

2600X

i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
94.49k
125.56k (x1.33)
Test#2 (FP)
182.53k
115.86k (x0.63)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
45.95k
25.63k (x0.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.15k
9.4k (x0.93)
TOTAL
333.12k
276.46k (x0.83)

Performance/W
2600X
i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
995 points/W
2790 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1921 points/W
2575 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
484 points/W
570 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
107 points/W
209 points/W
TOTAL
3507 points/W
6144 points/W

Performance/GHz
2600X
i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
3749 points/GHz
5605 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6261 points/GHz
4882 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1408 points/GHz
1115 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4401 points/GHz
2380 points/GHz
TOTAL
15819 points/GHz
13982 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4