Ryzen 5 2600X vs Core i7-7700K
Description
The 2600X is based on Zen+ architecture while the i7-7700K is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2600X gets a score of 333.1 k points while the i7-7700K gets 289.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 2600X is 1.1 times faster than the i7-7700K . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2600X gets a score of 333.1 k points while the i7-7700K gets 289.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 2600X is 1.1 times faster than the i7-7700K . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
800f82
906e9
Core
Pinnacle Ridge
Kaby Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
4.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
95 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x64+6x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
8192 kB
Date
April 2018
September 2016
Mean monothread perf.
66.44k points
76.9k points
Mean multithread perf.
333.12k points
289.82k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2600X
i7-7700K
Test#1 (Integers)
15.75k
30.44k (x1.93)
Test#2 (FP)
26.29k
26.91k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.91k
6.25k (x1.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
18.48k
13.3k (x0.72)
TOTAL
66.44k
76.9k (x1.16)
Multithread
2600X
i7-7700K
Test#1 (Integers)
94.49k
127.73k (x1.35)
Test#2 (FP)
182.53k
123.68k (x0.68)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
45.95k
29.34k (x0.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.15k
9.08k (x0.89)
TOTAL
333.12k
289.82k (x0.87)
Performance/W
2600X
i7-7700K
Test#1 (Integers)
995 points/W
1345 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1921 points/W
1302 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
484 points/W
309 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
107 points/W
96 points/W
TOTAL
3507 points/W
3051 points/W
Performance/GHz
2600X
i7-7700K
Test#1 (Integers)
3749 points/GHz
6765 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6261 points/GHz
5981 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1408 points/GHz
1388 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4401 points/GHz
2955 points/GHz
TOTAL
15819 points/GHz
17089 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4