| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 2600X vs Core i7-7560U


Description
The 2600X is based on Zen+ architecture while the i7-7560U is based on Kaby Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2600X gets a score of 333.1 k points while the i7-7560U gets 97.3 k points.

Summarizing, the 2600X is 3.4 times faster than the i7-7560U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
800f82
806e9
Core
Pinnacle Ridge
Kaby Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1356
Cores/Threads
6/12
2/4
TDP
95 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x64+6x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
4096 kB
Date
April 2018
January 2017
Mean monothread perf.
66.44k points
48.16k points
Mean multithread perf.
333.12k points
97.27k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2600X
i7-7560U
Test#1 (Integers)
15.75k
19.37k (x1.23)
Test#2 (FP)
26.29k
17.26k (x0.66)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.91k
3.78k (x0.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
18.48k
7.75k (x0.42)
TOTAL
66.44k
48.16k (x0.72)

Multithread

2600X

i7-7560U
Test#1 (Integers)
94.49k
39.17k (x0.41)
Test#2 (FP)
182.53k
38.24k (x0.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
45.95k
8.9k (x0.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.15k
10.97k (x1.08)
TOTAL
333.12k
97.27k (x0.29)

Performance/W
2600X
i7-7560U
Test#1 (Integers)
995 points/W
2611 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1921 points/W
2549 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
484 points/W
593 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
107 points/W
731 points/W
TOTAL
3507 points/W
6485 points/W

Performance/GHz
2600X
i7-7560U
Test#1 (Integers)
3749 points/GHz
5097 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6261 points/GHz
4543 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1408 points/GHz
994 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4401 points/GHz
2041 points/GHz
TOTAL
15819 points/GHz
12674 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4