Ryzen 5 2600X vs Core i7-6820HQ
Description
The 2600X is based on Zen+ architecture while the i7-6820HQ is based on Skylake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2600X gets a score of 333.1 k points while the i7-6820HQ gets 205.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 2600X is 1.6 times faster than the i7-6820HQ. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2600X gets a score of 333.1 k points while the i7-6820HQ gets 205.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 2600X is 1.6 times faster than the i7-6820HQ. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
800f82
506e3
Core
Pinnacle Ridge
Skylake-H
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA1440
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
95 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x64+6x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
8192 kB
Date
April 2018
October 2015
Mean monothread perf.
66.44k points
50.1k points
Mean multithread perf.
333.12k points
205.89k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2600X
i7-6820HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
15.75k
20.99k (x1.33)
Test#2 (FP)
26.29k
18.63k (x0.71)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.91k
4.33k (x0.73)
Test#1 (Memory)
18.48k
6.15k (x0.33)
TOTAL
66.44k
50.1k (x0.75)
Multithread
2600X
i7-6820HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
94.49k
91.8k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
182.53k
87.24k (x0.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
45.95k
20.55k (x0.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.15k
6.3k (x0.62)
TOTAL
333.12k
205.89k (x0.62)
Performance/W
2600X
i7-6820HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
995 points/W
2040 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1921 points/W
1939 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
484 points/W
457 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
107 points/W
140 points/W
TOTAL
3507 points/W
4575 points/W
Performance/GHz
2600X
i7-6820HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
3749 points/GHz
5831 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6261 points/GHz
5174 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1408 points/GHz
1204 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4401 points/GHz
1708 points/GHz
TOTAL
15819 points/GHz
13917 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4