Ryzen 5 2600X vs 2600
Description
Both models 2600X and 2600 are based on Zen+ architecture.
Zen+ is the second generation of Ryzen processors. It uses the 12nm process by GlobalFoundries. Other than that, the die is the same than first generation Zen. It comes with 64kB of L1 cache and 512kB of L2 cache per core. There are 3 variants: Pinnacle Ridge (desktop), Colfax (high-end desktop) and Picasso (APU).
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2600X gets a score of 333.1 k points while the 2600 gets 292.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 2600X is 1.1 times faster than the 2600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Zen+ is the second generation of Ryzen processors. It uses the 12nm process by GlobalFoundries. Other than that, the die is the same than first generation Zen. It comes with 64kB of L1 cache and 512kB of L2 cache per core. There are 3 variants: Pinnacle Ridge (desktop), Colfax (high-end desktop) and Picasso (APU).
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2600X gets a score of 333.1 k points while the 2600 gets 292.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 2600X is 1.1 times faster than the 2600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
800f82
800f82
Core
Pinnacle Ridge
Pinnacle Ridge
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
AM4
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/12
6/12
TDP
95 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x64+6x32 kB
6x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
April 2018
April 2018
Mean monothread perf.
66.44k points
57.33k points
Mean multithread perf.
333.12k points
292.31k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2600X
2600
Test#1 (Integers)
15.75k
13.83k (x0.88)
Test#2 (FP)
26.29k
23.16k (x0.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.91k
5.15k (x0.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
18.48k
15.18k (x0.82)
TOTAL
66.44k
57.33k (x0.86)
Multithread
2600X
2600
Test#1 (Integers)
94.49k
83.44k (x0.88)
Test#2 (FP)
182.53k
161.53k (x0.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
45.95k
40.62k (x0.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.15k
6.72k (x0.66)
TOTAL
333.12k
292.31k (x0.88)
Performance/W
2600X
2600
Test#1 (Integers)
995 points/W
1284 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1921 points/W
2485 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
484 points/W
625 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
107 points/W
103 points/W
TOTAL
3507 points/W
4497 points/W
Performance/GHz
2600X
2600
Test#1 (Integers)
3749 points/GHz
3547 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6261 points/GHz
5938 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1408 points/GHz
1321 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4401 points/GHz
3893 points/GHz
TOTAL
15819 points/GHz
14699 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4