Ryzen 5 2600X vs Core i5-11400F
Description
The 2600X is based on Zen+ architecture while the i5-11400F is based on Rocket Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2600X gets a score of 333.1 k points while the i5-11400F gets 495.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-11400F is 1.5 times faster than the 2600X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2600X gets a score of 333.1 k points while the i5-11400F gets 495.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-11400F is 1.5 times faster than the 2600X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
800f82
a0671
Core
Pinnacle Ridge
Rocket Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
6/12
6/12
TDP
95 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x64+6x32 kB
6x32+6x48 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
12288 kB
Date
April 2018
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
66.44k points
88.34k points
Mean multithread perf.
333.12k points
495.65k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2600X
i5-11400F
Test#1 (Integers)
15.75k
31.66k (x2.01)
Test#2 (FP)
26.29k
26.21k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.91k
11.96k (x2.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
18.48k
18.5k (x1)
TOTAL
66.44k
88.34k (x1.33)
Multithread
2600X
i5-11400F
Test#1 (Integers)
94.49k
210.36k (x2.23)
Test#2 (FP)
182.53k
203.84k (x1.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
45.95k
72.05k (x1.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.15k
9.4k (x0.93)
TOTAL
333.12k
495.65k (x1.49)
Performance/W
2600X
i5-11400F
Test#1 (Integers)
995 points/W
3236 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1921 points/W
3136 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
484 points/W
1108 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
107 points/W
145 points/W
TOTAL
3507 points/W
7625 points/W
Performance/GHz
2600X
i5-11400F
Test#1 (Integers)
3749 points/GHz
7196 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6261 points/GHz
5957 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1408 points/GHz
2718 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4401 points/GHz
4205 points/GHz
TOTAL
15819 points/GHz
20076 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4