| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 2600 vs Xeon Silver 4110


Description
The 2600 is based on Zen+ architecture while the 4110 is based on Skylake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2600 gets a score of 291.5 k points while the 4110 gets 281.5 k points.

Summarizing, the 2600 is 1 times faster than the 4110. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
800f82
50654
Core
Pinnacle Ridge
Skylake-SP
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA3647
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
65 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x64+6x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
11264 kB
Date
April 2018
July 2017
Mean monothread perf.
57.13k points
45.82k points
Mean multithread perf.
291.53k points
281.48k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
2600
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
3.41k
3k (x0.88)
Test#2 (FP)
15.96k
12.29k (x0.77)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.69k
3.64k (x0.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.42k
6.55k (x0.38)
TOTAL
41.47k
25.46k (x0.61)

Multithread

2600

4110
Test#1 (Integers)
20.88k
20.42k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
110.37k
95.83k (x0.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
39.25k
30.88k (x0.79)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.66k
9.7k (x1.46)
TOTAL
177.16k
156.83k (x0.89)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2600
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
13.76k
18.78k (x1.36)
Test#2 (FP)
23.03k
16.25k (x0.71)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.12k
3.99k (x0.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.23k
6.8k (x0.45)
TOTAL
57.13k
45.82k (x0.8)

Multithread

2600

4110
Test#1 (Integers)
83.23k
133.55k (x1.6)
Test#2 (FP)
161.06k
108.43k (x0.67)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
40.52k
30.02k (x0.74)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.73k
9.48k (x1.41)
TOTAL
291.53k
281.48k (x0.97)

Performance/W
2600
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
1281 points/W
1571 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2478 points/W
1276 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
623 points/W
353 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
103 points/W
112 points/W
TOTAL
4485 points/W
3311 points/W

Performance/GHz
2600
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
3529 points/GHz
6259 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5904 points/GHz
5417 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1313 points/GHz
1330 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3904 points/GHz
2267 points/GHz
TOTAL
14650 points/GHz
15273 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4