Ryzen 5 2600 vs Core i9-10900X
Description
The 2600 is based on Zen+ architecture while the i9-10900X is based on Cascade Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2600 gets a score of 291.5 k points while the i9-10900X gets 632.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10900X is 2.2 times faster than the 2600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2600 gets a score of 291.5 k points while the i9-10900X gets 632.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10900X is 2.2 times faster than the 2600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
800f82
50657
Core
Pinnacle Ridge
Cascade Lake-X
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 2066
Cores/Threads
6/12
10/20
TDP
65 W
165 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x64+6x32 kB
10x32+10x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
10x1024 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
19712 kB
Date
April 2018
November 2019
Mean monothread perf.
57.13k points
62.28k points
Mean multithread perf.
291.53k points
632.35k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2600
i9-10900X
Test#1 (Integers)
13.76k
25.97k (x1.89)
Test#2 (FP)
23.03k
22.37k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.12k
5.3k (x1.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.23k
8.63k (x0.57)
TOTAL
57.13k
62.28k (x1.09)
Multithread
2600
i9-10900X
Test#1 (Integers)
83.23k
281.98k (x3.39)
Test#2 (FP)
161.06k
259.01k (x1.61)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
40.52k
64.87k (x1.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.73k
26.5k (x3.94)
TOTAL
291.53k
632.35k (x2.17)
Performance/W
2600
i9-10900X
Test#1 (Integers)
1281 points/W
1709 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2478 points/W
1570 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
623 points/W
393 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
103 points/W
161 points/W
TOTAL
4485 points/W
3832 points/W
Performance/GHz
2600
i9-10900X
Test#1 (Integers)
3529 points/GHz
5526 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5904 points/GHz
4760 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1313 points/GHz
1128 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3904 points/GHz
1835 points/GHz
TOTAL
14650 points/GHz
13250 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4