Ryzen 5 2600 vs Core i7-9700K
Description
The 2600 is based on Zen+ architecture while the i7-9700K is based on Coffee Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2600 gets a score of 291.5 k points while the i7-9700K gets 460 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-9700K is 1.6 times faster than the 2600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2600 gets a score of 291.5 k points while the i7-9700K gets 460 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-9700K is 1.6 times faster than the 2600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
800f82
906ec
Core
Pinnacle Ridge
Coffee Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/8
TDP
65 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x64+6x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
12288 kB
Date
April 2018
October 2018
Mean monothread perf.
57.13k points
73.62k points
Mean multithread perf.
291.53k points
460.02k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2600
i7-9700K
Test#1 (Integers)
13.76k
29.3k (x2.13)
Test#2 (FP)
23.03k
25.61k (x1.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.12k
5.86k (x1.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.23k
12.86k (x0.84)
TOTAL
57.13k
73.62k (x1.29)
Multithread
2600
i7-9700K
Test#1 (Integers)
83.23k
217.77k (x2.62)
Test#2 (FP)
161.06k
190.46k (x1.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
40.52k
40.48k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.73k
11.31k (x1.68)
TOTAL
291.53k
460.02k (x1.58)
Performance/W
2600
i7-9700K
Test#1 (Integers)
1281 points/W
2292 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2478 points/W
2005 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
623 points/W
426 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
103 points/W
119 points/W
TOTAL
4485 points/W
4842 points/W
Performance/GHz
2600
i7-9700K
Test#1 (Integers)
3529 points/GHz
5981 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5904 points/GHz
5226 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1313 points/GHz
1195 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3904 points/GHz
2624 points/GHz
TOTAL
14650 points/GHz
15025 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4