| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 2600 vs Core i7-6600U


Description
The 2600 is based on Zen+ architecture while the i7-6600U is based on Skylake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2600 gets a score of 292.3 k points while the i7-6600U gets 79.2 k points.

Summarizing, the 2600 is 3.7 times faster than the i7-6600U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
800f82
406e3
Core
Pinnacle Ridge
Skylake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA1356
Cores/Threads
6/12
2/4
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x64+6x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
4096 kB
Date
April 2018
September 2015
Mean monothread perf.
57.33k points
39.73k points
Mean multithread perf.
292.31k points
79.22k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
2600
i7-6600U
Test#1 (Integers)
3.41k
2.75k (x0.81)
Test#2 (FP)
15.96k
12.23k (x0.77)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.69k
3.9k (x0.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.42k
5.61k (x0.32)
TOTAL
41.47k
24.48k (x0.59)

Multithread

2600

i7-6600U
Test#1 (Integers)
20.88k
5.23k (x0.25)
Test#2 (FP)
110.37k
25k (x0.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
39.25k
8.98k (x0.23)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.66k
4.73k (x0.71)
TOTAL
177.16k
43.95k (x0.25)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2600
i7-6600U
Test#1 (Integers)
13.83k
16.72k (x1.21)
Test#2 (FP)
23.16k
14.7k (x0.63)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.15k
3.4k (x0.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.18k
4.9k (x0.32)
TOTAL
57.33k
39.73k (x0.69)

Multithread

2600

i7-6600U
Test#1 (Integers)
83.44k
33.41k (x0.4)
Test#2 (FP)
161.53k
31.66k (x0.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
40.62k
8.18k (x0.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.72k
5.97k (x0.89)
TOTAL
292.31k
79.22k (x0.27)

Performance/W
2600
i7-6600U
Test#1 (Integers)
1284 points/W
2227 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2485 points/W
2111 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
625 points/W
546 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
103 points/W
398 points/W
TOTAL
4497 points/W
5282 points/W

Performance/GHz
2600
i7-6600U
Test#1 (Integers)
3547 points/GHz
4919 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5938 points/GHz
4325 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1321 points/GHz
999 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3893 points/GHz
1441 points/GHz
TOTAL
14699 points/GHz
11684 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4