Ryzen 5 2600 vs Core i7-10870H
Description
The 2600 is based on Zen+ architecture while the i7-10870H is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2600 gets a score of 291.5 k points while the i7-10870H gets 487 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-10870H is 1.7 times faster than the 2600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2600 gets a score of 291.5 k points while the i7-10870H gets 487 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-10870H is 1.7 times faster than the 2600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
800f82
a0652
Core
Pinnacle Ridge
Comet Lake-H
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
AM4
FC-BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
65 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x64+6x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
16384 kB
Date
April 2018
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
57.13k points
79.2k points
Mean multithread perf.
291.53k points
487.05k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
2600
i7-10870H
Test#1 (Integers)
3.41k
4.77k (x1.4)
Test#2 (FP)
15.96k
19.81k (x1.24)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.69k
6.29k (x1.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.42k
14.03k (x0.81)
TOTAL
41.47k
44.9k (x1.08)
Multithread
2600
i7-10870H
Test#1 (Integers)
20.88k
31.21k (x1.49)
Test#2 (FP)
110.37k
151.01k (x1.37)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
39.25k
50.13k (x1.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.66k
8.37k (x1.26)
TOTAL
177.16k
240.71k (x1.36)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2600
i7-10870H
Test#1 (Integers)
13.76k
30.38k (x2.21)
Test#2 (FP)
23.03k
27.95k (x1.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.12k
6.51k (x1.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.23k
14.37k (x0.94)
TOTAL
57.13k
79.2k (x1.39)
Multithread
2600
i7-10870H
Test#1 (Integers)
83.23k
216.18k (x2.6)
Test#2 (FP)
161.06k
210.82k (x1.31)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
40.52k
51.57k (x1.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.73k
8.47k (x1.26)
TOTAL
291.53k
487.05k (x1.67)
Performance/W
2600
i7-10870H
Test#1 (Integers)
1281 points/W
4804 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2478 points/W
4685 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
623 points/W
1146 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
103 points/W
188 points/W
TOTAL
4485 points/W
10823 points/W
Performance/GHz
2600
i7-10870H
Test#1 (Integers)
3529 points/GHz
6075 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5904 points/GHz
5589 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1313 points/GHz
1302 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3904 points/GHz
2873 points/GHz
TOTAL
14650 points/GHz
15840 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4