| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 2600 vs Core i5-9500


Description
The 2600 is based on Zen+ architecture while the i5-9500 is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2600 gets a score of 291.5 k points while the i5-9500 gets 352.8 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-9500 is 1.2 times faster than the 2600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
800f82
906ea
Core
Pinnacle Ridge
Coffee Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
6/12
6/6
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x64+6x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
9216 kB
Date
April 2018
April 2019
Mean monothread perf.
57.13k points
73.65k points
Mean multithread perf.
291.53k points
352.84k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
2600
i5-9500
Test#1 (Integers)
3.41k
4.45k (x1.31)
Test#2 (FP)
15.96k
18.43k (x1.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.69k
5.84k (x1.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.42k
12.63k (x0.73)
TOTAL
41.47k
41.34k (x1)

Multithread

2600

i5-9500
Test#1 (Integers)
20.88k
24.75k (x1.19)
Test#2 (FP)
110.37k
103.1k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
39.25k
32.43k (x0.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.66k
5.56k (x0.84)
TOTAL
177.16k
165.85k (x0.94)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2600
i5-9500
Test#1 (Integers)
13.76k
29.17k (x2.12)
Test#2 (FP)
23.03k
25.49k (x1.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.12k
5.84k (x1.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.23k
13.15k (x0.86)
TOTAL
57.13k
73.65k (x1.29)

Multithread

2600

i5-9500
Test#1 (Integers)
83.23k
166.66k (x2)
Test#2 (FP)
161.06k
146.9k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
40.52k
34.04k (x0.84)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.73k
5.25k (x0.78)
TOTAL
291.53k
352.84k (x1.21)

Performance/W
2600
i5-9500
Test#1 (Integers)
1281 points/W
2564 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2478 points/W
2260 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
623 points/W
524 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
103 points/W
81 points/W
TOTAL
4485 points/W
5428 points/W

Performance/GHz
2600
i5-9500
Test#1 (Integers)
3529 points/GHz
6629 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5904 points/GHz
5793 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1313 points/GHz
1327 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3904 points/GHz
2990 points/GHz
TOTAL
14650 points/GHz
16739 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4