| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 2600 vs Core i5-7500


Description
The 2600 is based on Zen+ architecture while the i5-7500 is based on Kaby Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2600 gets a score of 291.5 k points while the i5-7500 gets 191.7 k points.

Summarizing, the 2600 is 1.5 times faster than the i5-7500 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
800f82
906e9
Core
Pinnacle Ridge
Kaby Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/4
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x64+6x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
6144 kB
Date
April 2018
September 2016
Mean monothread perf.
57.13k points
61.51k points
Mean multithread perf.
291.53k points
191.71k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
2600
i5-7500
Test#1 (Integers)
3.41k
3.87k (x1.14)
Test#2 (FP)
15.96k
16.09k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.69k
5.11k (x1.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.42k
7.97k (x0.46)
TOTAL
41.47k
33.04k (x0.8)

Multithread

2600

i5-7500
Test#1 (Integers)
20.88k
14.81k (x0.71)
Test#2 (FP)
110.37k
61.51k (x0.56)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
39.25k
19.59k (x0.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.66k
3.68k (x0.55)
TOTAL
177.16k
99.59k (x0.56)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2600
i5-7500
Test#1 (Integers)
13.76k
25.59k (x1.86)
Test#2 (FP)
23.03k
22.57k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.12k
5.27k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.23k
8.08k (x0.53)
TOTAL
57.13k
61.51k (x1.08)

Multithread

2600

i5-7500
Test#1 (Integers)
83.23k
88.3k (x1.06)
Test#2 (FP)
161.06k
78.59k (x0.49)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
40.52k
19.72k (x0.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.73k
5.1k (x0.76)
TOTAL
291.53k
191.71k (x0.66)

Performance/W
2600
i5-7500
Test#1 (Integers)
1281 points/W
1358 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2478 points/W
1209 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
623 points/W
303 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
103 points/W
79 points/W
TOTAL
4485 points/W
2949 points/W

Performance/GHz
2600
i5-7500
Test#1 (Integers)
3529 points/GHz
6734 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5904 points/GHz
5939 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1313 points/GHz
1387 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3904 points/GHz
2125 points/GHz
TOTAL
14650 points/GHz
16186 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4