| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 2600 vs Core i5-1035G4


Description
The 2600 is based on Zen+ architecture while the i5-1035G4 is based on Ice Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2600 gets a score of 292.3 k points while the i5-1035G4 gets 142.7 k points.

Summarizing, the 2600 is 2 times faster than the i5-1035G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
800f82
706e5
Core
Pinnacle Ridge
Ice Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
1.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1526
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x64+6x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
6144 kB
Date
April 2018
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
57.33k points
65.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
292.31k points
142.69k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
2600
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
3.41k
4.05k (x1.19)
Test#2 (FP)
15.96k
15.29k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.69k
9.04k (x1.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.42k
10.54k (x0.61)
TOTAL
41.47k
38.92k (x0.94)

Multithread

2600

i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
20.88k
9.05k (x0.43)
Test#2 (FP)
110.37k
33.88k (x0.31)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
39.25k
15.34k (x0.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.66k
6.74k (x1.01)
TOTAL
177.16k
65.01k (x0.37)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2600
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
13.83k
25.53k (x1.85)
Test#2 (FP)
23.16k
19.99k (x0.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.15k
9.31k (x1.81)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.18k
10.81k (x0.71)
TOTAL
57.33k
65.64k (x1.14)

Multithread

2600

i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
83.44k
58.46k (x0.7)
Test#2 (FP)
161.53k
57.31k (x0.35)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
40.62k
20.1k (x0.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.72k
6.81k (x1.01)
TOTAL
292.31k
142.69k (x0.49)

Performance/W
2600
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
1284 points/W
3897 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2485 points/W
3821 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
625 points/W
1340 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
103 points/W
454 points/W
TOTAL
4497 points/W
9513 points/W

Performance/GHz
2600
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
3547 points/GHz
6901 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5938 points/GHz
5401 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1321 points/GHz
2515 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3893 points/GHz
2922 points/GHz
TOTAL
14699 points/GHz
17739 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4