| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 2600 vs Core i5-10300H


Description
The 2600 is based on Zen+ architecture while the i5-10300H is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2600 gets a score of 292.3 k points while the i5-10300H gets 246.1 k points.

Summarizing, the 2600 is 1.2 times faster than the i5-10300H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
800f82
a0652
Core
Pinnacle Ridge
Comet Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
65 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x64+6x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
8192 kB
Date
April 2018
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
57.33k points
69.47k points
Mean multithread perf.
292.31k points
246.07k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2600
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
13.83k
27.14k (x1.96)
Test#2 (FP)
23.16k
24.75k (x1.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.15k
5.73k (x1.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.18k
11.84k (x0.78)
TOTAL
57.33k
69.47k (x1.21)

Multithread

2600

i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
83.44k
105.77k (x1.27)
Test#2 (FP)
161.53k
107.47k (x0.67)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
40.62k
24.82k (x0.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.72k
8.02k (x1.19)
TOTAL
292.31k
246.07k (x0.84)

Performance/W
2600
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
1284 points/W
2350 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2485 points/W
2388 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
625 points/W
552 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
103 points/W
178 points/W
TOTAL
4497 points/W
5468 points/W

Performance/GHz
2600
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
3547 points/GHz
6031 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5938 points/GHz
5500 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1321 points/GHz
1274 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3893 points/GHz
2632 points/GHz
TOTAL
14699 points/GHz
15437 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4